Local, Timely, Proven: How to make your story work for media across Africa

Many organisations have stories they believe are worth telling, but what makes it newsworthy to local media? You may be building new technologies, creating jobs, solving infrastructure challenges, improving access to essential services or bringing fresh thinking to long-standing social issues. Yet even strong stories can fail to land with your target broadcast, print or online local and regional media channels.

Why? Because media coverage is not secured by reaching a business milestone or having something to say. It depends on whether that story feels relevant to the publication’s readership and target audience, arrives at the right moment (why is it relevant at this particular time? What is the news hook?) and is supported by evidence journalists can trust.

For innovators, entrepreneurs and impact-led organisations working across African markets, effective media relations require more than a polished press release. It means understanding what journalists need, how newsrooms work and what makes a story useful to the readers they serve.

1. MAKE IT LOCAL, NOT JUST INTERESTING

A story may be important to your organisation, but that does not automatically make it important to an outlet’s audience. They are looking for stories that connect with the conversations and concerns shaping their local context.

As Fabrice, an experienced local media consultant we work with in Senegal, notes, “media is about now”. Reporters are looking for stories that feel timely and close to their readers, geographically and culturally. A regional announcement, for example, is much stronger when it is made relevant to a specific market: what it means for local businesses, communities, policymakers, consumers or investors.

The more clearly you can answer “why does this matter here?”, the more useful your story becomes.

2. LEAD WITH THE NEWS, NOT THE MARKETING MESSAGE

One of the most common reasons good stories fail to secure coverage is that they sound too much like a sales pitch. Journalists are not there to amplify a brand message. They are there to inform, explain, to educate their readers/listeners/viewers and, of course, scrutinise.

That does not mean organisations should avoid talking about their work. It means the story needs to be framed around a wider issue or shift in the market. What problem are you helping to solve? What trend does your work reveal? What new evidence, insight or perspective can you bring?

Fabrice puts it simply: if you want a story to be interesting, it should not look like marketing or sound too sales-led. The strongest media stories give journalists something their audience will find genuinely useful, not just something the organisation wants to promote.

3. BRING PROOF, NOT JUST HOPE OR AMBITION

Journalists need confidence that the information they are using is accurate. Claims about innovation, growth, impact or market leadership should be backed by clear evidence and credible sources.

This is especially important for organisations working in technical or fast-moving sectors, where complex ideas can easily be overstated or misunderstood. Good media pitching requires discipline: check the facts, simplify the message and make sure every claim can be supported.

Nike, a media expert in Nigeria, reminds us of the importance of originality and careful factchecking when speaking to journalists. In Nigerian media, reporters specialise in particular sectors, from finance and technology to energy, health, education or agriculture. These journalists understand the landscape and will quickly recognise whether a story has substance.

Strong evidence helps them do their job well. It also protects your organisation’s credibility.

4. CUT THE JARGON

Complex work does not need complex language. In fact, jargon is often what prevents a strong story from travelling beyond a specialist audience.

Journalists are sometimes generalists, not specialising in one specific sector, and the  public are not always experts in your field, nor should they need to be. Clear, concise language makes it easier for reporters to understand the significance of your work and explain it accurately to their readers.

This does not mean oversimplifying the substance. It means translating technical or organisational language into human terms and clear, plain English. Replace abstract claims with concrete examples. Explain what has changed, who is affected and why it matters now.

5. BUILD RELATIONSHIPS BEFORE YOU NEED COVERAGE

Working well with the media is about pitching stories and building trust over time.

Nike’s advice to innovators is to “make friends with journalists” over time, not in a transactional sense, but by being responsive and accurate. When journalists know you can provide timely information and reliable context, they are more likely to come to you for your own announcements and for expert perspective on a wider issue.

Arnold, a seasoned PR and local media consultant in Tanzania, makes a similar point. The media is hungry for accurate and informed content. Organisations that position themselves as authoritative sources can become valuable, trusted sounding boards for journalists, helping to improve the quality and accuracy of coverage.

And that strong relationship can make all the difference for successful reputation management in more challenging moments. If you have invested in trust before a crisis, you will be better placed to communicate quickly and clearly when scrutiny is higher.

6. SHOW WHAT IS NEW, AND WHY IT MATTERS NOW

Novelty is rarely enough on its own. A new product, service or initiative becomes media-worthy when there is context. it connects to an urgent need, a live debate or a visible shift in the market.

Before approaching the media, ask: what is genuinely new here? Why should a journalist cover it today? What wider conversation does it contribute to? What evidence shows that this is more than an internal milestone?

The stories that land are usually those that combine innovation with relevance. They help audiences understand a problem, a solution or a change that is already shaping their world.

MAKING MEDIA RELATIONS WORK

Good media relations in Africa, as in any market, is not about chasing coverage for its own sake. It is about helping journalists tell accurate, timely and relevant stories. Be local. Be current. Be useful. Bring proof. Build relationships. And above all, remember that the strongest stories are not always the ones that say the most about an organisation. They are the ones that connect human interest with impact, showing why its work matters in the wider world and giving audiences a reason to care.

Obama’s African visit

 

Isabelle Alenus-Crosby

President Obama’s long-awaited trip to Africa is coming to an end, and he didn’t manage to hide the real reason he was there.

Many Presidents are visiting the continent these days, but the fact that Obama is half white American and half black African means that, in Africa itself, his visit has generated a lot more interest than when (for instance) China’s new president embarked on a trip less than two weeks after taking office earlier this year. What also differentiates Obama from the others is that he makes great speeches, and I especially liked his ideas for a “Power Africa” initiative and “sustainable” African energy strategy.

All through his trip, the President has looked happy, relaxed, and “at home”, despite all the security that he has surrounded himself and his family with. What seems to have been most significant to those he went to visit is that, in all three countries (Senegal, Tanzania and South Africa), Obama emphasised that he welcomes world economies turning their sights to Africa. However, as his trip matures, his real views are increasingly being felt.

African leaders should “pick their international partners carefully”, and “push back against countries that bring in their own workers”, a clear criticism of China. Another clear criticism of China was Obama’s “wildlife and importance of tourism speech”, condemning illegal trafficking. The White House has already issued a statement this morning regarding the launch of a new anti-poaching initiative in Tanzania as of next month.

From the cheers heard yesterday in Dar es Salaam however, it is clear that the word “partnership” is the magic word in Africa these days. When Obama said the West’s goal is to “partner” with Africa, the crowds went wild.

It is important to note that both the USA and Europe are home to large communities with strong African heritages and that Africa and America/Europe often share a common language, making training and technology transfer much more straightforward. Africans know this, and they clearly want it. We also have a common history, for better or for worse. It is Europe’s common history (mostly violent) that unites them now within a European Union that, even though it is still in its infancy, seems to be doing alright despite some teething problems.

The younger generation in Africa, Europe and America have a lot in common through a shared history, that we are coming out of together, and the significance of this cannot be trivialised. This does not mean that partnerships with China are a bad idea.  In fact, Africa has already partnered successfully with many countries in Asia, forming the bulk of the South-South trade. Obama’s words should however be a warning to China, one that I’m sure they’ll heed given the investments they’ve made on the continent in the last decade.

The bottom line is that the whole African continent is full of promise. I would therefore like to reiterate what I wrote in my previous blog: A united Africa will be stronger, but I agree that it must choose its partners well. Yesterday afternoon, Obama revealed a venture, dubbed ‘‘Trade Africa,’’ that aims to increase the flow of goods between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa. The initial phase will focus on East Africa — Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Uganda, and Tanzania — and in a couple of years, the phase will be extended to the rest of Sub-Saharan Africa.

Let’s hope that this will be a partnership made in heaven, and just one of many.

 

The United States of Africa?

 

Isabelle Alenus-Crosby

Gaddafi’s dream might live on through an “undercurrent” that seems to be uniting Sub-Saharan African countries

I have just returned from Ghana, the 30th country (or so) that I have now visited in Africa. Even though I was only in Accra, Ghana’s capital, I completely understand why the Ghanaian diaspora is so keen to return home.

Ghana, like many other places in Africa, is buzzing. As I was walking around the city centre, a thought suddenly occurred to me. Now that Africa is increasingly hailed as the “rising continent”, those in the West who are keen to stand out as “experts”, insist on shouting from every rooftop that “Africa is a continent, not a country”.  I don’t know who their audience is, pre-teens who opted out of Geography perhaps, but even though I would never claim to be an expert in anything except daydreaming about the beaches of Mozambique, I can’t help but notice increasing similarities between Africa and America.

As a child, when I lived in Tanzania and my parents and I would drive to Kenya (for shopping) or to Zambia (to visit my sister), each country seemed quite different. I don’t feel that way anymore. In my gap year, back in 1996, I drove across the whole of North America (petrol was cheap then), and even though I found the United States to be very diverse, from Alaska to Louisiana, I always knew that I was in the USA.  Yet, as soon as I entered Canada I felt that I was in a very different country. Some “undercurrent” seemed to unite all the States I visited, yet it wasn’t present in Canada. I am starting to feel the same way about North Africa/Sub-Saharan Africa. North Africa is significantly different to its neighbours in the South, but driving around Accra last week, I could easily have been in Kampala or Nairobi. The billboards, buildings, street sellers, all have the same “feel” that you simply don’t find in North Africa or anywhere else in the world.

Africa has many languages and cultures, yes, but  I am writing this blog from Belgium, a tiny county where 60% of the population speaks Dutch, 38% speaks French and 2% German.  The Dutch is divided into hundreds of Flemish dialects that could easily be mistaken for different languages as they don’t even sound the same (don’t get me started on the cultural differences here).  Yet every city is similar enough for me to know that I haven’t crossed any of the country’s borders. Europe is very much a continent, united mostly by an agreement between 27 countries not go go to war anymore. 10 minutes into France and you are definitely no longer in Belgium.  Even the petrol stations are different by the way they look, the items they sell in the store, and the lavatories.  Countries in Asia and Latin America differ as much as those in Europe.

 

In Sub-Saharan Africa however, petrol stations are quite similar, just like in the US they are quite similar in all 50 states (including Hawaii).  This brings me to President Obama’s upcoming trip to Sub-Saharan Africa (which merits a blog of its own – watch this space) on June 26th. He will be visiting Senegal, Tanzania and South Africa, 3 of my favourite countries on the continent. He intends to focus on economic cooperation and I believe that he might expand the African Growth and Opportunity Act, the Clinton-era legislation that provides Sub-Saharan countries with duty-free access to America’s markets for almost all products (except sugar, dairy and peanuts). To Americans, their President will be doing business with “Africa”, plain and simple. While Obama has devoted significant time to emerging economies in Asia and Latin America, he has spent just one day in sub-Saharan Africa since taking office (a 24-hour visit to Ghana in 2009).

I hope that his upcoming visit will give American citizens an updated view of Sub-Saharan Africa, as once the continent becomes more “united”, a process that seems already underway, not only by my humble observations, but also through trade barriers being dropped and increasing political and economic cooperation, it will certainly be a force to be reckoned with. A more united Africa will certainly be able to meet the challenges of globalisation.  And America best take note.

They know better than anyone the strength that lies in unity.

Causing a stir: The fifth BRICS Summit

 

Isabelle Alenus-Crosby

The BRICS account for 21% of world GDP (IMF), 17% of world trade, and over 40% of the world’s population. This year, BRICS is expected to grow at almost 5%, well above the world average (at 3.6%).

This year’s summit therefore received quite a lot of media attention, and not just due to the attendance of the brand-new Chinese President Xi Jinping, nor because of the above statistics.

For South Africa, which makes up just 2.5% of total GDP in BRICS, the summit was an opportunity to showcase its role as an investment gateway to Africa and President Zuma therefore invited 15 African heads of state to attend. Tensions between South Africa and Nigeria (surrounding Nigeria’s belief that they should also be part of BRICS) means that President Goodluck Jonathan did not attend, but other heads of state including Angola, Cote d’Ivoire, Senegal, Uganda, Ethiopia and Egypt, did. Each country actively showcased its nation, grabbing the momentum of the African continent’s current economic boom.

What caused the greatest stir however, were the talks about the establishment of a development bank, which would rival the World Bank and the IMF, and is meant to fund infrastructure and development projects in member states and developing nations, through a joint foreign reserves fund.

The discussions of where the bank will be, or how much money each nation will contribute, did not reach a conclusion. Several experts and officials have said the bank will start with 50 billion dollars, divided equally. BRICS members are clearly seeking greater sway in global finance to match their rising economic power. Undoubtedly the “New Development Bank” will be top of next year’s agenda. The 2014 Summit will be held in Brazil.